The Silent Profit Killer: Returns Fraud and Refund Fraud Exposed

Retail is under siege by a sophisticated form of economic sabotage that threatens the very foundation of online commerce as it silently erodes retail profitability. The rise of online shopping has a corresponding rise in online returns with a significant increase in return fraud, as the convenience of ecommerce has made it easier for fraudsters to exploit return policies. Returns fraud and refund fraud have transformed from a minor inconvenience into a multibillion-dollar crisis that undermines the entire ecommerce ecosystem. In 2022, an estimated $816 billion of merchandise was returned in the United States, with a staggering $84.9 billion classified as fraudulent (more than 10%). The problem has grown rapidly, initially fueled by the explosive ecommerce growth during the COVID pandemic, with retailers experiencing a 67% increase in return rates over the past five years.

What is Return Fraud?

Return fraud refers to the act of manipulating a retailer’s return policy for personal gain. This deceptive practice involves exploiting the return process to obtain a refund, exchange, or store credit under false pretenses. Return fraud can manifest in various forms, including receipt fraud, where fake or altered receipts are used to return items, and price switching, where barcodes or price tags are swapped to secure a higher refund. Wardrobing, another common tactic, involves purchasing items with the intention of using them temporarily before returning them. According to the National Retail Federation, return fraud costs retailers billions of dollars each year, posing a significant challenge for both online retailers and brick-and-mortar stores.

The Economic Impact of Refund Fraud

The scale of returns fraud is staggering, and the financial consequences extend far beyond simple refunds, encompassing a wide range of fraudulent activity. Processing a single return costs an average of 20% – 30% of the original order value. The total annual cost of retail fraud has ballooned to $101 billion, with holiday seasons seeing returns fraud account for nearly 20% of all returns.

Types of Fraudulent Returns

There are several types of fraudulent returns that retailers need to be aware of. These include:

• Receipt Fraud: This involves creating or altering receipts to return stolen merchandise or items purchased at a discount for a full refund. This intricate scheme targets both online and physical retail stores. To effectively combat these schemes, retailers must employ advanced tools and strategies to detect return fraud and protect their bottom line.
• Price Switching: A deliberate manipulation requiring careful execution whereby barcodes are altered, or price tags are swapped between two items with distinctly different prices to obtain larger refunds. For example, one might purchase a higher and lower-priced item, swap price tags between the two, and then return the lower-priced item for the higher refund amount. Or they may modify the barcode on an item to trigger a more favorable refund.
• Product Swapping: A type of return fraud where a new condition item is purchased and then an older, worn, or broken item is returned in the new product’s packaging. The business approves the refund, not knowing about the deception until the next customer has a bad purchase experience.
• Empty Box Fraud: The scammer reports that the box was delivered empty or missing some of the intended contents, requesting a refund or replacement without shipping anything back to the retailer.
• No Delivery Claim: Customers claim their order was not delivered and claim a full refund when the item(s) were indeed delivered; keeping both the item and the refund.
• Chargeback Fraud: Customers dispute legitimate charges with their credit card company, claiming the transaction(s) were not unauthorized or that they never received the product (similar to making a No Delivery claim with the Seller). This forces the retailer to prove the order’s validity or lose the value of both the product and the revenue.
• Wardrobing: This involves purchasing an item with the intention of only using it temporarily, and then returning it for a full refund, effectively “renting” the product for free. This is particularly common for luxury items that might be needed for one-time events or one-time use, such as parties, meetings, or to complete a non-recurring task, treating online retailers like free rental services.
• Employee Collusion: This involves dishonest employees collaborating with outside individuals to manipulate the return process or facilitate fraudulent returns.
• Cross-Retailer Return Fraud: This involves purchasing an item at a discount from one store and then returning it for its full retail value at another retailer.
• Bogus Product Defect: A customer falsely claims that a product was delivered damaged or otherwise defective to either secure a refund without returning the item or to receive a replacement and complete the transaction, having acquired two for the price of one. This involves fabricating or exaggerating product flaws to trigger the retailer’s return or replacement policy without genuine grounds for the claim.
• Store Credit Abuse: Store credit abuse is a type of return fraud that involves manipulating the return process to obtain store credit or refunds under false pretenses. This can include returning items that were not purchased or returning items that are not in their original condition. To prevent store credit abuse, retailers can implement strict return procedures, such as requiring receipts and identification for returns. Limiting the amount of store credit that can be issued for returns and monitoring transaction data to detect suspicious activity are also effective measures. By taking these steps, retailers can reduce the risk of store credit abuse and protect their business from fraudulent activities.
• Component Stripping: Primarily targeting high-end electronics; scammers purchase the devices, remove valuable components to sell them, and then return the items with the missing components. Often, retailers have no idea until the item is resold and doesn’t work for the next customer.
• Bracketing: A risk management shopping approach where customers intentionally order multiple variations of a product, knowing in advance that they will only be keeping one or a select few. The convenience of browsing online catalogs and knowing that the returns will be free allows consumers to “try it before they truly buy it.”

These fraudulent activities not only erode profitability but also complicate inventory management and customer service efforts.

Consequences of Return Fraud

The consequences of return fraud can be severe for retailers. According to the National Retail Federation, return fraud costs retailers an estimated $100 billion each year. Beyond the immediate financial losses, return fraud can damage a retailer’s reputation and erode customer trust. When customers perceive a retailer as vulnerable to fraud, they may question the integrity of the business, leading to a decline in customer loyalty. Additionally, return fraud can create significant inventory management issues, as retailers may not receive the items back that they think they have, further complicating stock control and forecasting.

Preventing Return Fraud

Preventing return fraud requires a multi-faceted approach. Retailers can start by implementing clear return policies and communicating them effectively to customers. Cutting down on legitimate return causes helps separate returns from return fraud. Utilizing digital tracking and online portals to record each customer’s return history can help detect fraud patterns. Advanced technologies like machine learning algorithms, artificial intelligence, and fraud detection software are invaluable tools in identifying and preventing fraudulent returns. Training employees to recognize and prevent return fraud is also crucial. By equipping staff with knowledge and tools to spot suspicious activities, retailers can significantly reduce the risk of fraudulent returns.

Summary of Refund and Returns Fraud

Returns fraud represents a complex economic challenge requiring continuous monitoring and adaptation. Retailers must remain vigilant and leverage the latest fraud detection tools and technology while designing a returns program that protects their bottom line while encouraging customer trust and loyalty. By employing technology, training employees to spot patterns, and consistently enforcing return policies, retailers can prevent systemic abuse and minimize the impact of fraudulent activity on profitability. The battle against returns fraud transcends simple loss prevention. The ability to detect, prevent, and mitigate fraudulent returns and refunds will separate successful retailers from vulnerable targets.

Frequently Asked Questions

How serious is return fraud?

Return and Refund fraud costs sellers $100 billion a year.

How to prevent return fraud?

The less anonymous people are when doing returns, the harder fraud becomes. Requiring customer ID or other details beyond just a receipt makes fraud harder.

Is return fraud hard to prove?

Yes. It’s hard to separate legitimate returns from return fraud.

• Category: Uncategorized